Home Builder Canada Readers survey
NP_lineHome Builder Magazine New Products Online
Computers, Educational

Electrical & Mechanical
Finishes & Surfaces
Kitchens & Baths
Landscape & Design
Speciality Products
Tools & Equipment
Windows & Doors
New Products home

External Links: Associations & Governments. Builders & Renovators . Manufacturers & Suppliers

Home . About Us . Subscribe . Advertise . Editorial Outline . Contact Us . Current Issue . Back Issues . Jon Eakes

© Copyright - Work-4 Projects Ltd.

“Missing middle” a miss for house owners

August 9, 2023

A widespread government proposal to create more affordable housing through large-scale rezoning of detached-house neighbourhoods into multi-unit housing rentals has run into a problem.
Many single-detached house owners want nothing to do with the missing middle plan that has been endorsed by senior governments and municipalities from Victoria, British Columbia to Halifax, Nova Scotia.
In both Ontario and B.C., proposed provincial legislation would allow multiple residential units on single-detached lots without the need for bylaw amendments.
In January 2023, Victoria legislated a Missing Middle Housing Initiative. It allows duplexes to four-plexes and townhouses to be built in areas where traditional single-family houses exist.
The City of Vancouver goes a step further with its proposed policy to allow up to six units of housing on all land in the city now zoned for single houses and to discourage the construction of new detached houses by restricting the size of new builds.
This policy will proceed to public hearings in September 2023.
Missing middle initiatives are also in place in, or proposed for, Edmonton, Ottawa, Toronto and Halifax.
In each city, city planners and proponents forecast a rush of applications from detached house owners to rezone to higher density.
But this rush is not happening.
In Victoria, after seven months, not a single application has come forward from a detached house owner willing to turn their private land into a multi-unit rental complex, according to city councillor Chris Coleman.
Opposition to the missing middle is growing in Edmonton, and especially in Vancouver, where the benchmark detached house price is now north of $2.5 million.
“Many detached house owners are not willing to risk their financial future and peace of mind by jumping on board a plan that they fear, rightly, will transform their quiet communities and expose them to the federal capital gains tax that could grab up to 50 per cent of their real estate equity,” said realtor Kevin Skipworth, broker manager of Dexter Realty Associates of Vancouver.
Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) notes only a private residence is immune from capital gains tax—currently at 50 per cent.
“If the property was solely your principal residence for every year you owned it, you do not have to pay tax on the gain. If at any time during the period you owned the property, it was not solely your principal residence, you might not be able to benefit from the principal residence exemption on all or part of the capital gain,” CRA explained.
Also, under the missing middle plans, detached house owners opting for higher density would pay GST on new building or renovation, and higher property taxes. Owners would be required to pay development cost charges or “bonus density” fees in any space used for other than lower-cost rentals. In B.C., rental increases would also be restricted to 2% per year under provincial legislation, despite rising costs.
“Private detached house owners are somehow, miraculously, expected to deliver what seasoned developers, city planners and other bureaucrats cannot: low-cost rentals in Vancouver,” Skipworth noted by suggesting few house owners would be opting in.


homeBUILDERcanada.com | Home BUILDER Magazine | Canada's #1 Information Source for Residential Home Builders and Professional Renovators

HB house ad sub
Home Builder Magazine Ask Jon Eakes
Home Builder current issue